首页> 外文OA文献 >To align or not to align? Research methods and its relationship with dissertation marks across sport undergraduate degree programmes within a UK-based HE institution
【2h】

To align or not to align? Research methods and its relationship with dissertation marks across sport undergraduate degree programmes within a UK-based HE institution

机译:对齐还是不对齐?研究方法及其与英国高等教育机构内体育本科学位课程的论文标记的关系

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Much research has referred to the complexity of research methods modules within undergraduate degree programmes. Less attention has been paid to the objective understanding of alignment between research methods and final year dissertations. This study explored relationships across Sport and Exercise Science (SES) and Sports Therapy (ST) programmes within a UK-based Higher Education institution. Analysis revealed females (N=73) outperformed males (N=117) at Levels 4/5, and SES students outperformed ST at Level 6. The Level 5 statistics assessment explained the lowest variance in the dissertation, suggesting poor alignment in curriculum design. Future research should consider the efficacy of statistics-based modules.
机译:许多研究都提到了本科学位课程中研究方法模块的复杂性。人们对研究方法和最后一年的论文之间的一致性的客观了解很少。这项研究探讨了位于英国高等教育机构中的运动与运动科学(SES)与运动疗法(ST)计划之间的关系。分析显示,在4/5级时,女性(N = 73)优于男性(N = 117),在6级时,SES学生的表现优于ST。5级统计评估解释了论文中的最低方差,表明课程设计的一致性差。未来的研究应考虑基于统计的模块的有效性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号